<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for PCSDesk</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pcsdesk.com/index.php/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pcsdesk.com</link>
	<description>IT Management and Maintenance Services for the Small Business</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 09:39:33 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Which Win7 For You? by Brian Gallutia</title>
		<link>http://www.pcsdesk.com/index.php/2009/07/28/which-win7-for-you/comment-page-1/#comment-37</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Gallutia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 22:53:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcsdesk.com/?p=236#comment-37</guid>
		<description>I got another email question and thought it best to post for all to enjoy...

"Have you noticed anything about it locking up… more frequently than it should? I got your newsletter and was checking it out. We have it on a laptop at home and it’s locking up more than what it probably should, but that could also be the laptop itself."

My response:

It’s funny that you mention this.  Recently, my Windows 7 has been hard-locking after recovering from power-saving mode.  Unfortunately, it’s happened to me randomly and I suspect it has something to do with software that I run throughout the day.

However, with a laptop, by default it probably goes into sleep mode.  Is that when you’re having a problem?

Finally, keep in mind that this is RC software and not finalized, so hopefully whatever the issue is, it won’t follow us into the full version.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I got another email question and thought it best to post for all to enjoy&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8220;Have you noticed anything about it locking up… more frequently than it should? I got your newsletter and was checking it out. We have it on a laptop at home and it’s locking up more than what it probably should, but that could also be the laptop itself.&#8221;</p>
<p>My response:</p>
<p>It’s funny that you mention this.  Recently, my Windows 7 has been hard-locking after recovering from power-saving mode.  Unfortunately, it’s happened to me randomly and I suspect it has something to do with software that I run throughout the day.</p>
<p>However, with a laptop, by default it probably goes into sleep mode.  Is that when you’re having a problem?</p>
<p>Finally, keep in mind that this is RC software and not finalized, so hopefully whatever the issue is, it won’t follow us into the full version.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Which Win7 For You? by Brian Gallutia</title>
		<link>http://www.pcsdesk.com/index.php/2009/07/28/which-win7-for-you/comment-page-1/#comment-36</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Gallutia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 18:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcsdesk.com/?p=236#comment-36</guid>
		<description>Here is a question submitted to us via email:

"Just got your news letter and have a question, I pre-ordered a copy of 7 Pro (upgrade) back in June, I believe, when you could get it for ½ off, but the Ultimate was not available for that promo.  Am I correct in saying the only difference in the two versions is BitLocker?"

My response:

It’s not the only difference, but as far as a feature that guys like you and me would use, BitLocker is really the only thing you’re missing.

The article on the web site links to Ultimate’s features if you want to read more on it.

Honestly, for me it’s going to be Home Premium at home and Professional on my laptop.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is a question submitted to us via email:</p>
<p>&#8220;Just got your news letter and have a question, I pre-ordered a copy of 7 Pro (upgrade) back in June, I believe, when you could get it for ½ off, but the Ultimate was not available for that promo.  Am I correct in saying the only difference in the two versions is BitLocker?&#8221;</p>
<p>My response:</p>
<p>It’s not the only difference, but as far as a feature that guys like you and me would use, BitLocker is really the only thing you’re missing.</p>
<p>The article on the web site links to Ultimate’s features if you want to read more on it.</p>
<p>Honestly, for me it’s going to be Home Premium at home and Professional on my laptop.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on PCS Win7 Upgrade Option by Brian Gallutia</title>
		<link>http://www.pcsdesk.com/index.php/2009/07/28/pcs-offering-win7-upgrade-option/comment-page-1/#comment-35</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Gallutia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 18:01:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcsdesk.com/?p=252#comment-35</guid>
		<description>We got one good question via email that I thought should be shared:

"Hello guys,
     I  hear that the new version of Windows 7 has a major flaw.  If you are upgrading from a XP version, that one loses all data from the drive.  Prior applications and programs need to be re-installed.  Is this True?  If so, are there plans to get around this problem?"

We have an upcoming article that is going to deal with the upgrade paths for Windows 7, but to address your question, there is no direct upgrade path from WindowsXP to Windows7.  

You can buy a Win7 Upgrade, but what will happen on an XP box is that it will be a clean install.  In other words, all programs, data and settings will need to be manually re-established.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We got one good question via email that I thought should be shared:</p>
<p>&#8220;Hello guys,<br />
     I  hear that the new version of Windows 7 has a major flaw.  If you are upgrading from a XP version, that one loses all data from the drive.  Prior applications and programs need to be re-installed.  Is this True?  If so, are there plans to get around this problem?&#8221;</p>
<p>We have an upcoming article that is going to deal with the upgrade paths for Windows 7, but to address your question, there is no direct upgrade path from WindowsXP to Windows7.  </p>
<p>You can buy a Win7 Upgrade, but what will happen on an XP box is that it will be a clean install.  In other words, all programs, data and settings will need to be manually re-established.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Win7 Thoughts by Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.pcsdesk.com/index.php/2009/05/18/win7-thoughts/comment-page-1/#comment-34</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 20:05:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcsdesk.com/?p=181#comment-34</guid>
		<description>So here's my true test. I took it upon myself to 'redo' my wife's laptop using the Windows 7 Release Candidate. Took the steps to backup all the data and then formatted the system. Once Loaded, Win7 really, really is impressive. The OS found all the drivers for the system, so I didn't have to go scrounging for them. The plug and play was seamless, meaning it loaded the camera my wife uses without question or hassle. After loading Open Office and Mozilla Thunderbird (Win7 RC has no built in email client)she was underway. Now the true test you may ask. Not one complaint regarding speed, or drivers or web implementing. She was able to remote connect to her office and work without so much as a peep. Impressive indeed. I actually am looking forward to next years official release of Win7, which means I have to redo all my systems, again. Frick! :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So here&#8217;s my true test. I took it upon myself to &#8216;redo&#8217; my wife&#8217;s laptop using the Windows 7 Release Candidate. Took the steps to backup all the data and then formatted the system. Once Loaded, Win7 really, really is impressive. The OS found all the drivers for the system, so I didn&#8217;t have to go scrounging for them. The plug and play was seamless, meaning it loaded the camera my wife uses without question or hassle. After loading Open Office and Mozilla Thunderbird (Win7 RC has no built in email client)she was underway. Now the true test you may ask. Not one complaint regarding speed, or drivers or web implementing. She was able to remote connect to her office and work without so much as a peep. Impressive indeed. I actually am looking forward to next years official release of Win7, which means I have to redo all my systems, again. Frick! <img src='http://www.pcsdesk.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Win7 Thoughts by Aaron</title>
		<link>http://www.pcsdesk.com/index.php/2009/05/18/win7-thoughts/comment-page-1/#comment-32</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 16:01:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcsdesk.com/?p=181#comment-32</guid>
		<description>I have to agree with Brian.  I have not had enough time to play with Windows 7 yet but my first impressions were that it really is what Vista should have been.  It looks good, it functions well, and runs fast.  I look forward to finding out if they have fixed some of the other issues that Vista had but from my first impressions I have no reason to doubt the improvements I have seen and will see.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to agree with Brian.  I have not had enough time to play with Windows 7 yet but my first impressions were that it really is what Vista should have been.  It looks good, it functions well, and runs fast.  I look forward to finding out if they have fixed some of the other issues that Vista had but from my first impressions I have no reason to doubt the improvements I have seen and will see.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Welcome to the party Mac.. by Aaron</title>
		<link>http://www.pcsdesk.com/index.php/2009/04/23/welcome-to-the-party-mac/comment-page-1/#comment-31</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 13:49:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcsdesk.com/?p=120#comment-31</guid>
		<description>I wanted to bring up 2 points.  People complain about Vista's User Access Control (UAC), which is annoying and MS probably over did it.  However with Linux and Apple whenever ANYTHING gets installed it asks not just if it is ok, but for the system's password.  If you ask me that is where A LOT of the security comes from.  Also of course the fact that OS X is completely locked down and gagged in a closet like Brian said.

Also I think Apple will need less of a market share to attract pop-ups and possible scams, because OS X attracts two types of people for the most part.  Music people or very basic users who have money.  If a person can target 90% of the market but not everyone there has a lot of money it doesn't do them as much good.  However Apple is A LOT more expensive than PC, which means that other 10% or whatever it is has more money to take.  Why target China's population that has little money?  When you can target let's say the UK which has much more money per person?

Watch out Apple users you aren't invincible, just scarce.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wanted to bring up 2 points.  People complain about Vista&#8217;s User Access Control (UAC), which is annoying and MS probably over did it.  However with Linux and Apple whenever ANYTHING gets installed it asks not just if it is ok, but for the system&#8217;s password.  If you ask me that is where A LOT of the security comes from.  Also of course the fact that OS X is completely locked down and gagged in a closet like Brian said.</p>
<p>Also I think Apple will need less of a market share to attract pop-ups and possible scams, because OS X attracts two types of people for the most part.  Music people or very basic users who have money.  If a person can target 90% of the market but not everyone there has a lot of money it doesn&#8217;t do them as much good.  However Apple is A LOT more expensive than PC, which means that other 10% or whatever it is has more money to take.  Why target China&#8217;s population that has little money?  When you can target let&#8217;s say the UK which has much more money per person?</p>
<p>Watch out Apple users you aren&#8217;t invincible, just scarce.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Welcome to the party Mac.. by Brian Gallutia</title>
		<link>http://www.pcsdesk.com/index.php/2009/04/23/welcome-to-the-party-mac/comment-page-1/#comment-30</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Gallutia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 18:17:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcsdesk.com/?p=120#comment-30</guid>
		<description>When comparing stability between Mac and PC, there are some things to keep in mind:

1. Apple "closes off" its platform, which means that those software developers out there that want to create programs for the Mac have to go through a LOT in order to do so.  With Windows, there are standards, but the standards don't always have to be adhered to.

2.  Vista's doom was brought about by a lot of hardware vendors not having drivers ready when Vista was released.  Microsoft was indirectly responsible for this by changing the hardware specs a few months prior Vista's launch.  When you switch to Vista and your sound and video cards don't work, that's a biiiiig problem.

3. "Stability" is inversely proportional to "freedom."  If I locked my kids in a closet, tied them up and put gags in their mouths, someone could label my kids as being "well behaved" and "stable" since they're not making any noise or causing trouble.  Conversely, if I take my kids to a playground full of other kids with jungle gyms to climb and swings to play on, then the "stable" label is replaced by "running" and "doing what they are supposed to be doing," which is having fun.

(Boy, I hope this comparison doesn't make me look creepy)

So, to sum up, Apple = closet, Windows PC = playground.  

As for Linux, that's just a big field in the middle of nowhere that allows you to build whatever you want ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When comparing stability between Mac and PC, there are some things to keep in mind:</p>
<p>1. Apple &#8220;closes off&#8221; its platform, which means that those software developers out there that want to create programs for the Mac have to go through a LOT in order to do so.  With Windows, there are standards, but the standards don&#8217;t always have to be adhered to.</p>
<p>2.  Vista&#8217;s doom was brought about by a lot of hardware vendors not having drivers ready when Vista was released.  Microsoft was indirectly responsible for this by changing the hardware specs a few months prior Vista&#8217;s launch.  When you switch to Vista and your sound and video cards don&#8217;t work, that&#8217;s a biiiiig problem.</p>
<p>3. &#8220;Stability&#8221; is inversely proportional to &#8220;freedom.&#8221;  If I locked my kids in a closet, tied them up and put gags in their mouths, someone could label my kids as being &#8220;well behaved&#8221; and &#8220;stable&#8221; since they&#8217;re not making any noise or causing trouble.  Conversely, if I take my kids to a playground full of other kids with jungle gyms to climb and swings to play on, then the &#8220;stable&#8221; label is replaced by &#8220;running&#8221; and &#8220;doing what they are supposed to be doing,&#8221; which is having fun.</p>
<p>(Boy, I hope this comparison doesn&#8217;t make me look creepy)</p>
<p>So, to sum up, Apple = closet, Windows PC = playground.  </p>
<p>As for Linux, that&#8217;s just a big field in the middle of nowhere that allows you to build whatever you want <img src='http://www.pcsdesk.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Welcome to the party Mac.. by akasusan</title>
		<link>http://www.pcsdesk.com/index.php/2009/04/23/welcome-to-the-party-mac/comment-page-1/#comment-29</link>
		<dc:creator>akasusan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 02:25:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcsdesk.com/?p=120#comment-29</guid>
		<description>Lest we not forget the stability of the Mac OS ... at least Microsoft is making progress w/ Vista ... I have used PCs since 1986 and a Mac since 2007 ... they both have their individual qualities ... the Pirates of Silicon Valley prevail!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lest we not forget the stability of the Mac OS &#8230; at least Microsoft is making progress w/ Vista &#8230; I have used PCs since 1986 and a Mac since 2007 &#8230; they both have their individual qualities &#8230; the Pirates of Silicon Valley prevail!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on New Meat by dsensing</title>
		<link>http://www.pcsdesk.com/index.php/2009/03/02/new-meat/comment-page-1/#comment-28</link>
		<dc:creator>dsensing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 22:37:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcsdesk.com/?p=99#comment-28</guid>
		<description>You have not been having near as much fun since I left your employ in 1997, so I think you should call him Don. In fact, you should all adopt Don as a nickname. Your life will improve. Really.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You have not been having near as much fun since I left your employ in 1997, so I think you should call him Don. In fact, you should all adopt Don as a nickname. Your life will improve. Really.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Training Your PCS Spam Filter by akasusan</title>
		<link>http://www.pcsdesk.com/index.php/2008/12/01/training-your-pcs-spam-filter/comment-page-1/#comment-27</link>
		<dc:creator>akasusan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 01:18:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcsdesk.com/?p=72#comment-27</guid>
		<description>Now I understand why my SPAM count is down ... the SPAMINATOR is working hard behind the scenes!  Thanks for the heads up!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now I understand why my SPAM count is down &#8230; the SPAMINATOR is working hard behind the scenes!  Thanks for the heads up!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
